To Kill a Wolf

As brushes with wolves rise, wildlife experts weigh whether the best way to preserve wolves could include hunting them.

By Erik Ness

(Page 4 of 4)

Middle Ground

David Mladenoff ponders the math. “Five hundred wolves? A million deer? We can have a lot more wolves,” he says. “But that’s unfortunately not what’s going to happen. I think we’re seeing that change in attitude already. And the irony is that we can actually probably have more wolves in the state if we’re able to have some kind of active management.”

The irony is that we can actually probably have more wolves in the state if we’re able to have some kind of active management.

Wydeven wants to wait and see. He’s hopeful that allowing property owners to remove problem wolves, an option that was briefly in force, may become available again if the wolf is taken off the endangered list. If that happens, he says, “it’s possible that we might start seeing the population stabilize at a level that’s reasonable for the landscape, that there may not be a need for a public harvest.”

But people need to change some habits, as well. Bear hunters need to think twice about where and when they run their dogs. And farmers may need to change some husbandry practices to protect young livestock. Those who live near wolves need to appreciate and accept that wolves have changed their definition of home.

Mladenoff remembers giving a talk, perhaps a decade ago, where he laid out how we would eventually reach this point in our relationship with wolves. A student approached afterward, very frustrated. “Why can’t we just leave the wolves alone?” she asked. “I really feel the same thing,” he answered. “But there is no place on the planet that is unmanaged, if you use ‘managed’ in a sense of either intentional or unintentional human impacts. No place. And this is how we affect this part of the planet.”

Then he wound around to a message that feels even more apt today. “If we want to have some of these components of natural systems around,” he told the student, “we just have to be more creative about our attitude toward this wild/non-wild dichotomy. We have to have a different attitude.”

For most of our history, that attitude has been to vilify and kill wolves however we could. Then we swung wildly to the other extreme, adopting them as sacred icons of untamed wilderness. And as Naughton warns, “neither is going to be an appropriate model for living with wolves. Ultimately, to learn to live with wolves, we have to figure out how to make fair rules and live with each other-meaning people who have very different values about wolves and nature.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Tags: , ,
Posted in Environment, Featured, Main feature, On The Cover, Spring 2009 | 6 Comments »

6 Responses to “To Kill a Wolf”

  1. Posted by: Nancy Miller | March 20th, 2009 at 3:03 pm

    Well . . . maybe hunt ‘em. They should have enough unpleasant encounters with humans to take care to avoid us, but we should realize that we are pushing our way into their wilderness and should be educated about what to do to avoid attracting them. And deer and other populations need to be managed so that wolves have lots to eat in the wild: that’ll keep them away from our villages and pastures.

  2. Posted by: Lillith | April 2nd, 2009 at 5:05 pm

    Many times I have read statements similar to: “people who accept these large predators are often the people who don’t live near them.” Yet, in my case that is untrue. For several years, I lived in what passes for wilderness in the US. My wild neighbors included coyotes, wolves, bears, and a few large cats. I had moved into their territory, but the wolves were better neighbors than some of the humans. The only problem? Well, actually there were two: keeping my dogs chained up at night so they didn’t try to start fights (that most likely would have led to the dogs visiting the veterinarian), and keeping my mouth shut around other people when I saw a wild animal or spotted tracks. Granted, I did not raise sheep or cattle. However, the wolves never bothered my chickens or my horse, and they left the chained dogs alone. Perhaps I was lucky.

  3. Posted by: Ron | April 3rd, 2010 at 3:38 am

    In accordence with you Lillith! I mayself have been around animals a good pard of my life. Now living in Missouri! Other than many inhumaine humans .I have band of coyotes, and wild life around my home. There are many times at least 2-300 run thru my back woods. But what some dont understand? Is not to bother them or their youngin’s. I have the fullest respect for Gods Creaters. I also have 4 dogs . and not once have they been bothered by and wild life. Its as if they know , i am not going to hurt them in any way. Wish others would learn this. But i guess that asking to much.You have to wonder who is the animal? Two legged or four??

  4. Posted by: Matt Peare | April 3rd, 2010 at 8:01 am

    Maybe we should hunt people. The Wolf population was once millions….MILLIONS! Not hundreds…. People need to leave the wilderness to the wild….

    Just a thought from a Wolf

  5. Posted by: Jeff Pearson | April 5th, 2010 at 3:37 pm

    I lived right on the edge of a dry river bed in NM. There were mountain lion, coyotes, and wolf. I lost a male cat to the mountain lion when she went into heat, but never had a problem with my chickens. Hell, the cat cave was only about 30 yards away from the house. I saw her once when I looked in the cave she lived in. Then I knew what the dogs were barking at every night when she came out to hunt. When one of my dogs got some chickens, I just knew i needed to protect them more, cause the coyotes would have probably been the culprits if the dogs weren’t there. It seems to me that if you leave them alone they leave you alone. They know that we too are predators, they can see we have eyes in front of our face and not to the sides like prey animals

  6. Posted by: Jon Rinehart BS '83 | December 17th, 2010 at 6:44 am

    Our government (federal,state,and DNR) will need to reimburse folks for the wolf damage AND allow limited hunting in accord with Wisconsin’s carrying capicity or else we may have a situation like western Idaho has with wolf population in excess of the carrying capacity.

Have Something to Add? Comment here!