Science for Everyone

Wisconsin residents of all ages and backgrounds are tracking wolves, monitoring streams, banding birds, counting invasive plants and more—all in the name of “citizen science”

By Denise Thornton

At dusk Dave Wiltrout steps out of his house and climbs into a Ford F150 to follow the lonely roads of the Chequamegon National Forest till well after midnight. At an isolated spot, he stops, steps out of the truck, and moves silently down the dark road. Then he fills his lungs and howls.

He’s hoping to learn from answering calls whether the wolf packs he identified while snow tracking the previous winter have added new members. A retired veterinarian who earned his howling chops while treating sled dog teams, Wiltrout sometimes finds that his howls are a bit too effective. “When they answer you back, it’s pretty spectacular. But when a wolf responds to your call from 50 yards away, and it’s pitch black out, and you are the only person for miles—that will make the hair go up on the back of your neck,” he says.

Despite his solitary treks, Wiltrout is no lone wolf. He is a citizen scientist, one of many volunteers who work with biologists, wildlife technicians and tribal conservation departments to monitor the wolf population of Wisconsin.

And the contribution of citizen scientists doesn’t end there. They are playing an increasingly crucial role in many areas of research at CALS and other institutions. Projects that incorporate citizen scientists benefit from an enthusiastic (and usually unpaid) workforce that allows researchers to conduct projects that otherwise would not be possible. And in return, citizen scientists increase their knowledge and contribute to issues that matter to them.

Data collected by citizen scientists directly benefits Adrian Treves, a professor with the UW-Madison Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, where he explores coexistence and conflicts between people and wildlife. “The accuracy of the wolf count in Wisconsin is important to both research and state policy,” he says. “Citizen scientists working with DNR biologists make it possible to locate every wolf pack and attempt to enumerate every single wolf in the state.”

“The volunteers more than double the miles we can cover,” says Adrian Wydeven, a mammalian ecologist and conservation biologist with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR). “We try to cover as much of the landscape as possible to detect every wolf out there. Volunteers provide many more eyes and ears looking for wolves and searching for signs, and that gives us a better picture of the distribution of wolves in the state.”

The volunteer tracker program has been in place since 1995 and coordinates up to 150 trackers each year. Wydeven puts out a news release each fall requesting volunteers. “We get Internet inquiries, and I send them to our Wisconsin’s Volunteer Carnivore Tracking Program website.” (This URL and others provided below.)

To become a tracker, volunteers spend a weekend studying wolf ecology, survey methods, conservation and the social and political aspects of wolf management. Then they get outside to look for wolf signs and do howl surveys. A second class is a day-long animal tracking class in early winter to identify wolf tracks, conduct a survey within a certain area and fill out the survey forms.

The wolf count culminates every April when scientists and trackers convene at the Wausau Days Inn and pull out a big map of the state. That map gets covered in Post-its marked by numbers up to 11, which is the biggest wolf pack in the state. Volunteer data is included on that map. Wydeven says experienced volunteers are as good at reading tracks as agency biologists. Volunteers also jump into the discussion to interpret the data, giving them an opportunity to participate and gain a better understanding of how scientific information is formulated.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Tags: , , , , , , ,
Posted in Communities, Environment, Featured, Summer 2012 | 5 Comments »

5 Responses to “Science for Everyone”

  1. Posted by: Tracker | June 24th, 2012 at 7:13 am

    I was proud to participate in the volunteer tracking program until legislators stepped in and decided they did not believe our numbers. Instead we heard false statements such as there are many more wolves out there as a reason for voting for a wolf hunt. Well then, they can attend the ecology workshop, track training and donate hundreds of hours and count the wolves themself.

    Trackers were not considered stakeholders during these discussions, were not informed by DNR of the pending legislation and now the data trackers collected will be used to support a wolf hunting/trapping season that is not science based.

    Now that we have a law in place for a hunting/trapping season our work is valued? When Cathy Stepp is no longer DNR Secretary and legislators amend the law to make the hunting trapping season more reasonable, I will consider returning. You can say I am angry, hurt but most of all disappointed that the DNR turned its back on volunteer trackers and the wolf.

  2. Posted by: No Longer Volunteering for State of WI | June 25th, 2012 at 9:18 am

    I have volunteered for the WI Wolf Tracking program since it began…for over two decades. I have given the State of Wisconsin my time away from family, hundreds, if not thousands of dollars of donated gas and wear and tear on my truck, nights paying for a place to stay, and all without complaint…until now. I have tried my hardest to get my views across to the knuckleheads in Madison, but they were not at all interested in listening to the scientists or the public regarding this issue. Money talks…..lobbyists and special interests groups won this round.

    It will take an act of God to change the methodology for the hunt that our ill-informed and careless legislators have set in motion. The DNR Secretary has absolutely NO concern for Wisconsin wildlife resources and has played this entire issue for personal gain. Who wins? Surely not wildlife, only political good ol boys who are slapping themselves on their backs with “atta boys”. Which one of them would like to come along on a wolf census survey with me? Which one of them would like to see if I am qualified to know what a wolf track looks like? Which one of them would endure ticks, contract Lyme Disease, and wear a bug suit in 90 degree weather in July to conduct a survey? Which one of them will go out on a howl survey with me while dudes on four wheelers with dogs and guns are trashing the landscape and running all forms of wildlife to kingdom come? Which one of them will go to the funeral of the first citizen carelessly killed by stray shots while on a moonlight ski with their family? Who will count the wolves now? Oh I forgot, there won’t be any more wolves to count. Shame on you Governor Walker for signing another ludicrous bill that sets Wisconsin’s wildlife back 150 years. Now, should we talk about wetlands??

  3. Posted by: Adrian Wydeven | June 26th, 2012 at 9:53 am

    I realize a lot of people were disappointed by the legislature that created the wolf public harvest. Most WDNR people did not know about the specific legislation until it was made public for all. While some members of public questioned the DNR wolf count, I don’t know that this is a reflection on volunteer trackers, but more of a distrust of DNR surveys in general. We get the same distrust on deer and bear surveys. The WDNR does not make the laws, that is the role of the legislature. The DNR remained neutral on the legislation until the legislature passed the bills. Once passed and signed by the governor, the WDNR is resposnsible for developing harvest zones, quotas, and administrative rules to go along with the law. But WDNR does not have the option to change or disregard the law. Thus WDNR is now in the process of developing a wolf harvest system that will allow a recreational public hunting and trapping season for wolves, while still maintaining a healthy wolf popullation.

    While many people oppose the hunting and trapping of wolves, it needs to be understood the harvest is intended to be sustainable and not wipe out the wolf population. This is not taking us back 150 years, in fact not even 56 years when wolves were shot and trapped year-round and the state paid you $20 for every wolf you killed. The havest will be carefully regulated to make sure a sustainble population of wolves persists on the landscape. I realize a lot of trackers were upset over this process, but I hope most will continue to track wolves. We especially need citizen trackers now to make sure wolf populations are remaining viable, and to help us determine when and where we need to apply more conservation practices. With more controls applied to the wolf population, we need citizen trackers more than ever. We greatly appreciate all the trackers who have devoted their time, efforts and funding over the years. Adrian Wydeven, WDNR.

  4. Posted by: KWolf | June 26th, 2012 at 5:38 pm

    Great to learn about more opportunities to volunteer. I’m currently doing bat population surveys; I want to get my daughter involved in monitoring projects, so I appreciate the contacts list at the end of the article.

    Having met the people of the DNR “in the wild” (as in: not at work!), I know how deeply upset most of them are by Walker’s policies. Please don’t blame them for things that happen when their political hands are completely tied–they also don’t get to spout opinions on company time, so you wouldn’t know how hard it is for them to deal with the anti-environmental agenda of the current State administration. If wolves are being hunted and no one is there to monitor how it impacts their populations, how will Walker’s nutcases ever be stopped? We need the data, even when we’re ticked-off about how it’s being used or not used.

  5. Posted by: Adrian Treves | June 27th, 2012 at 1:02 pm

    The comments made by our dedicated and self-sacrificing volunteer trackers hit home. Wisconsin was once held up as a model of wise management of wolves. I was one of the people who bragged about our science-based policies and prudent interventions that didn’t stir up public controversy. Political appointees have ignored the science from the grassroots work of civilian wolf trackers to academic studies spanning decades.

    Wisconsin may be headed for confrontations in courts and the specter of federal relisting of the wolf in my view, if the current, proposed hunting quotas are filled and extend beyond the first year. The best science available suggests the upcoming harvest will take more than the number of wolves expected; the wolves so tirelessly counted by civilian trackers and DNR biologists for decades. Will we see a 2013 surge in wolf reproduction as a response? Probably not. For one the hunt will eliminate breeders and it can take a pack a year or more to recover and breed again. Also we may not “see” anything. Because the trackers may boycott the annual wolf count we won’t know how many wolves we have left in March. Even the DNR biologists’ counts will be questionable because hunters may take a wolf after the DNR has counted it, given the timing of the wolf hunting season during the annual count. What worries me even more is the widespread and untested assumption that there are too many wolves to tolerate. Thirty years of study indicate the biggest challenges wolves pose for Wisconsin are attacks on domestic animals on private property — not attacks on hunting dogs, not taking too many deer — and there isn’t good evidence the wolf population size is more important than the wolf population spread. If proponents of Act 169 honestly wanted to address a real problem with wolf recovery they would have designed the hunt to reduce farm animal and pet dog depredations. Instead they propose to diminish the wolf population statewide, which could exacerbate the problem for livestock producers and rural landowners.

    Wisconsin is heading blind-folded into an uncertain future, led by poorly informed politicians and their appointees who have been unwilling to read evidence, listen to the experts, or consult the civilians who have devoted years to understanding the situation on the ground.

    In closing, I’ll repeat my testimony to legislators and the public. Wolves should be hunted with respect or not at all.

Have Something to Add? Comment here!